Dr. Rajesh Bhola
India
Apr 07, 2014
India
Apr 07, 2014
My
parents were strong advocates of scientific thinking, and growing up I
was part of science clubs and other activities, which gave me a lot of
room to learn about the who, how, when, where and why - and not to take
anything for granted. I was taught to think and to adopt a rational
approach. I once accompanied one of my friends to a ‘god-man’. There was
a huge congregation, with hundreds of devotees waiting for the
god-man’s ‘darshan’. I was told that he performs a miracle - moves his
hand in the air and blesses the devotees with ‘instant vibhuti’.
Religions often propagate such miracles. To be honest I did not like it,
because it left me feeling confused and isolated. My grandparents on
both sides were atheists and hence my parents were raised with no
religion - as were other members of our close family. My father told me
that I could believe in anything I wanted, but that he only believed in
the symphony of this universe at play - and, on top of all, in people.
His only advice to us was to be good human beings, to absorb and form
good values, and to work out - over time – the answers to how we wanted
to lead our lives. He said that the family would always be there to love
me as a person, to guide me with their experience and to give me a
shoulder to lean on when I was in need. The journey of a person with a
scientific temper is not easy, since being a ‘non-believer’ is so
unusual in India.; so many of our traditional rituals and festivals are
basically religious in theme.
The
rationalists or the atheists do not believe in miracles. A miracle is
an event that cannot possibly be explained by any of the natural forces
or natural laws. Rationalists have often found ‘miracles’ to be
baseless. Further, any evidence of a miracle would not prove that God
exists; it would simply prove that that there is a force in the universe
that we currently cannot comprehend. Since there have been no
documented miracles in the recent past, does anyone seriously believe
that there will be a miracle in his/her lifetime? And if there are no
miracles, then God cannot be ‘active’ and anyway does not appear in any
visible form as evidence. God does not seem to intervene in any way on
our planet. There is no evidence that God has answered any prayers. Many
bad things like earthquakes, plane crashes, murders and rapes happen in
the world all the time, with seemingly no regard for any religious
beliefs? Has God ever done anything to stop bad from happening? Is there
any evidence that God has ever used his powers; is there any
expectation that he will ever use them? Also, are we not being
self-centered when we ask a God to suspend the natural order just for
us? One explanation generally given by theists is the attribute of God
by which he fills the universe in all its parts and is present
everywhere at once. Not just a part, but the whole of God is present in
every place. How do we know if God is always present if he can’t be seen
or measured? And if you do not believe that God intervenes, is it
logical to pray to him and worship him?
We
do not need to believe in any god, to be moral. Atheists may be
non-believers but they are per se clearly not immoral or unethical; many
also donate to charities. There is no single ideology that all
atheists share, nor are there any institutionalised rituals or
behaviours. Atheism in its broadest sense is an absence of belief in the
existence of gods. This definition includes both those who assert that
there are no gods and those who make no claim about whether gods exist
or not. Narrower and more common definitions, however, often only
qualify those who assert there are no gods as atheists, labelling the
others as agnostics or simply non-theists. Sometimes atheism is a stage
in between different religions. With or without religion, good people
behave well and bad people do evil. Also, by denying belief in gods, one need not totally dissociate oneself from the culture associated with religion.
Virtually every agriculturalist celebrates a winter and summer solstice
holiday. Such a celebration can also be important to an atheist, for
its intrinsic social values of sharing and community.
In the Indian context, scientific rationalism as a belief system is gaining a toehold.
Religion is indeed considered part of our identity in India, but that
is changing - at least amongst the growing middle class, which is
organising fast within groups online. Such ‘activists’ need to focus on
more than just religion. There are many other areas in which critical
thinking and scientific skepticism are needed. Indeed, there are many
‘self-identified atheists’ who gladly buy into illogical and
pseudoscientific ideas. To change that, India’s new atheists are taking
the battle from the classes to the masses, to help debunk the claims of
astrologers, tantriks and ‘god-men’. Despite long years of democracy,
India remains one of the world’s most repressive societies. Political
groups routinely use religion to stoke hatred and provoke deadly riots;
and the Constitution and the law seem bent on intertwining — rather than
separating — religion and the State. In the long term that’s what the
atheists, or free thinkers, aim to change.
One
can choose to lead a happy life within a set of mutually agreed, and
continually re-negotiated, boundaries, so that the communities of which
we are a part of do not collapse. And that choice can be made from a
desire to live as a socially responsible person - without the guidance
of any faith or religion, We can love, live a good life and deal with the various demons we encounter - without the God factor. We can do so just as a group of people, willing to support each other in our times of need. But religion has its place….and a purpose.
It is necessary, for it purifies the general masses - which are
generally ignorant and illiterate - and lifts them from gross
materialism to something a little finer. We need not abandon religion in
order to find the truth. In fact it acts as a purifier. The external
customs of a religion were instituted to create internal mental and
spiritual habits. Probably, religions are centrally concerned with the
question of living meaningfully in an afflicted world; they have been
‘made’ to solve moral dilemmas, by addressing the struggles of the human
heart. Religion is perhaps best intended to loosen man from his
material desires and bind him with God.
As
children, we are extremely susceptible and prone to learning, which
means that what we learn may be hard to shake. Faith in anything should
be confined to one’s private space, because all it should do is help a
person to lead a good life. When it seeps into our public institutions,
it many times serves to dictate and divide. From school prayers to
marriage and after, religion creates a framework for how people should
act – which, although well-meaning in conception, has left so many
people leading empty and unfulfilled lives.
The
difference between a belief in a scientific theory as opposed to a
religious dogma, is the difference between the institution of science
and the institutions of various religions. Religious ‘facts’ are not
subject to testing, and in most cases cannot be tested; they are
supported by evidence that is open to interpretation - or no evidence at
all; they are not reviewed by other religions, to try and reach a
consensus. The institution of science is primarily concerned with
discovering the nature of reality without making any assumptions.
Scientific theories must, by definition, be testable; they must be
published, for review by other scientists, with the intention of
reaching a consensus. Accepted theories are supported by evidence that
is not open to interpretation, or is consistently interpreted by
qualified scientists. If evidence is found that contradicts a theory,
the theory will be abandoned. A scientific body derives its authority
from the review process, and because it has an interest in discovering
the truth – which is not the case with a religious body.
Dr.
Rajesh Bhola is President of Spastic Society of Gurgaon and is working
for the cause of children with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, mental
retardation and multiple disabilities for more than 25 years. He can be
contacted at rabhola@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment